Corporate Ink has released a new study about AI Visibility Strategy. It highlights the need for critical AI and GEO intelligence for B2B Tech Marketers.
According to a new report from Corporate Ink, 88% of CMOs face board pressure on AI visibility, yet only 34% of B2B tech marketers have a defined strategy to influence how generative AI engines represent their brand. This gap represents a critical vulnerability as AI-powered search increasingly mediates buyer discovery and evaluation.
There are 72% of marketers have seen AI describe their company in ways that are inaccurate, outdated, or incomplete. Of those, 29% aren’t addressing it. Once misinformation enters LLM training data, correcting it becomes exponentially harder.
Critical gaps in marketer knowledge include:
There’s also an ownership problem. Only 17% say PR and communications should own GEO, while 47% say digital marketing and SEO should. This misalignment is problematic because AI visibility is fundamentally a brand and credibility challenge, not technical. In addition, 51% cite limited internal GEO knowledge as their top obstacle. While 39% percent lack established coordination across content, PR, and web teams.
Most PR agencies aren’t delivering on GEO. Only 37% of marketers say their PR agency prioritizes AI visibility, while 45% say their agency is trying but lacks expertise.
If your organization is among the 88% being asked about AI visibility but lacks a defined strategy, the first step is intelligence gathering. Understand:
That foundation of intelligence will guide everything that follows: strategy prioritization, team alignment, partner selection, and measurement frameworks.
In 2026, AI visibility isn’t a nice-to-have. It’s a competitive imperative. And it starts with knowing where to focus strategically.
Download the Full Report: GEO and AI Visibility 2026 Report – Corporate Ink Research >
Key Takeaways at a Glance:
Get the Free download of the Corporate Ink GEO and AI Visibility 2026 Report >